Search for: "Fish v. Government Employees"
Results 101 - 120
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 2:27 pm
Kentucky law, for example, statutorily allows clerks to opt-out of selling hunting and fishing licenses. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:49 pm
In King v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
Under Maine law, which governed the employment relationship, overtime pay generally is required if the employee works more than 40 hours in a week. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
(Treaty Fishing Rights) on 5/21/18. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
McVicker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm
Puyallup in 1977, Your Honor, precisely said that it involved both on-and off-reservation activity, it was commercial activity, it was fishing, and this Court said that tribal immunity protected against that. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Lord Glennie did not consider that anything which had been pleaded in the present case created any sort of special circumstance where the director would be found personally liable for the company.He also considered the argument that Mr Emerson was jointly liable with Alba as tortfeasor because he either procured or assisted it in its wrongdoing (CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics plc [1988] UKHL 15,Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2015] UKSC10). [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
Fish and Wildlife Service, in which the court held that the Endangered Species Act allows the government to designate land as a “critical habitat” only if it is habitat for the listed species, and that the designating agency’s assessment of the costs and benefits of the designation is reviewable in court. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:36 pm
The government immunity found in Lewis is also supported by Dalehite v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
The Penobscot Nation is litigating for the right to enforce and regulate its hunting and fishing rights on the Penobscot River in Penobscot Nation v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
For example, a recent list adds former Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who oversaw the government’s changed position in a brief that conceded that SEC administrative law judges are officers of the U.S. and not mere employees for Appointments Clause purposes. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Employee Leadership Fund v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 1:04 pm
In Yates v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
III. 1 Strengthening the Government-to-Government RelationshipAs President Obama noted: ? [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
