Search for: "Floyd v. U.S. Government"
Results 101 - 120
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Floyd v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030 (1975). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030 (1975). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
The U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
The Court also relisted for the second time since calling for and receiving the record in Floyd v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
But in any event, there are three things I can't and won't ignore:There's the long-term track record of Apple's Android litigations across jurisdictions, and in 49 months of holy, thermonuclear war Apple has not proven that anyone in the world besides demonstrably biased U.S. juries and U.S. government agencies would give Apple any significant leverage over Android (even in the U.S., Samsung appears to be selling products that consumers like just as much as… [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Floyd v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
"
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Notably, former Pink Floyd band member Roger Waters was personally involved in the repatriation of two children to Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
China Economic and Security Review Commission was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Floyd, 72 P.3d 820 (Cal. 2003); People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:31 pm
The case, Stewart v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Passing OffGuestKat Alex Woolgar summarised the short but sweet judgment from Lord Justice Floyd in Media Agency Group Limited and Transport Media Limited v Space Media Agency Limited and Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 712 that overturned a rather generous first instance finding of passing off through cybersquatting.Publications and General MattersAnnsley Merelle Ward provided a nice write-up in anticipation of a new IBIL publication entitled The Sir… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
(relisted after the October 6, October 13, October 27, November 3, November 9 and November 21 conferences) Floyd v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:42 am
Floyd: The manifest function of the First Amendment in a representative government requires that legislators be given the widest latitude to express their views on issues of policy. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 30, 2007 US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am
IN addition, The Civil Rights Division of the U.S. [read post]
