Search for: "Foote v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 3,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 11:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Justice Sotomayor’s opinion keeps tribal employees on equal footing with federal and state employees and decides the import of indemnification provisions – really have nothing to do with Indian law and instead having everything to do with government employee indemnification law. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
Henning Lahmann (ESMT Berlin - Digital Society Institute) has posted 'Hacking Back' by States and the Uneasy Place of Necessity within the Rule of Law (Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, forthcoming). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am by Rose Hughes
Regardless of the approach eventually settled on by the UPC, the decision in K-fee v Nespresso is a reminder for constant vigilance in European prosecution if patentees are to avoid shooting themselves in the foot with respect to their US patent strategy. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:09 pm
Coast Guard called them for assistance at about 5:45 a.m. after the 80-foot F/V Eyak ran aground, then began to take on water about 16 miles south of Sitka. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm by Patricia Salkin
Instead, the court applied a percentage reduction to the value of the remainder parcel per square foot of FAR, utilizing the higher 20% figure proffered by the State as an admission against the State’s interest. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
   Indeed, in its last public trust/State title case, Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]