Search for: "Fowler v. Case" Results 101 - 120 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The system in Alberta was challenged on similar grounds in R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sclafani v Kahn  2019 NY Slip Op 01115  Decided on February 13, 2019 is an example of how the  Appellate Division, Second Department decides statute of limitation / continuous representation cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 5:05 pm by Shea Denning
The state supreme court in a per curiam opinion reversed the court of appeals’ decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 29 October 2018 Lord Speaker Lord Fowler issued a statement on parliamentary privilege. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm by Adam Feldman
A slew of Supreme Court researchers have written fascinating pieces about the justices’ case citations (Two of the many are from Fowler et al. (2007) and Cross et al. (2010).). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a question of fact as to whether the continuous representation doctrine tolled the statute of limitations as to this action (see Grace v Law, 24 NY3d 203, 212; Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789-790; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d 1085, 1086; cf. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J heard an application in the case of Reay v Beamont. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the continuous representation doctrine tolled the running of the statute of limitations (see Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d 1085, 1087). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
New Mexico and Colorado for this blog, and Lara Fowler does the same for the argument in Florida v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The second case is Florida v. [read post]