Search for: "Frank v Smith"
Results 101 - 120
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Greenwood Jordan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Grant v Frank, 150 AD3d 706, 707). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
Rosenbaum of Reed Smith on the firm's blog, Legal Bytes Innovation ? [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:08 am
SMITH, CRAIG B. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Somers, 138 U.S. 767 (2018): Perspectives: Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), and Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
Frank A. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:06 pm
Millan received the HERALD endorsement.GROUP 26 Judge Rodney Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:51 pm
The ruling, in California Public Employees' Retirement System v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
The case underlines the dangers of complacency and the importance of evidence, even when the point in dispute (has the mark BIG MAC been used for hamburgers) appears a simple one.Contribution to the Art Award – Frank Industries v Nike – Frank Industries’ brave fight against the bigger and badder Nike in securing an interim injunction over Nike’s use of LNDR (and then following up with a win at trial a short while later) won this award.Case of the… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
That decision is Mink v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that Theodore Frank, who will argue before the court later this month in Frank v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Claeys Ricci v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:June 20, 2024 CV-23-1408 [*1]In the Matter of Tory Gallante, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:June 20, 2024 CV-23-1408 [*1]In the Matter of Tory Gallante, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:06 pm
The en banc Fifth Circuit has ruled in Collins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:26 pm
Moats: Judge Jerry Smith reversed the trial court and held that the police officer lacked reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to justify pulling up behind the defendant's parked vehicle and activating her blue emergency lights.State of Tennessee v. [read post]
