Search for: "Frank v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
[Trevor Sheppard v Frank J. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
Consider, however, a motion to suppress under Franks v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 6:34 pm
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
" As a result, the case was remanded to the California Superior Court "where it was originally filed". [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:20 pm
When that motion was denied Mom appealed and the Superior Court quashed the appeal as interlocutory. (750 WDA 2021). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
”Malamas also argued Superior Court Justice Frank Newbould didn’t have authority to conduct the vexatious litigant application; there were inconsistencies in his reasons; and there was no admissible affidavit evidence in support of the application. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
The US Supreme Court today declined to take up the case of Cash v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm
Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:18 pm
We thank our local counsel Frank L. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
v=c8g4Ztf7hIMFor all you closet Festivus celebrators, you now have the recognition you have been looking for with the Order issued by the California Superior Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 4:22 pm
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Frank Jackson, sitting on assignment, concurred in the opinion, while Justice Frances Rothschild concurred separately. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” Finally, the Referee stated the Skype protocol was vastly superior to testimony by speaker phone which had been permitted in another case (Superior Sales & Salvage v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:47 am
American Optical Corp., et al., an asbestos personal injury lawsuit pending in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, awarded over $2.8 million to the surviving wife and the estate of Michael Galliher. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court decided Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
There’s nothing particularly new or ground-breaking about the recent Ontario Superior Court Decision in Sierra Excavating v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 1:18 pm
Bonner, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
Because the district court declined to instruct the jury as to retaliatory intent, the appeals court vacated the verdict in favor of the whistleblower and remanded for a new trial (Murray v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Stacking Waiver FormsIn the case of Franks v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
However, our Superior Court has recently ruled in the case of Frank v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 11:30 am
The problem is that these cases are "superiority" cases, not "predominance" cases, so it's hard to affirm the district court's decision on that basis given the particular decision here. [read post]
