Search for: "Frankel v. United States"
Results 101 - 116
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 4:08 am
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, No. 08-1214, the Supreme Court reinforced the courts’ role in deciding disputes over whether and when an agreement to arbitrate a dispute comes into existence.New York - Faragher-Ellerth defense not applicable under the New York City Human Rights LawKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLPIn Zakrzewska v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:15 am
"United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
They've cited, most recently, the Court's 5-4 decision this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Stephens United Methodist Church, 329 S.C. 433, 441, 494 S.E.2d 827, 831 (Ct. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Frankel & Newfield has the first decision concerning the scope of discovery in ERISA long term disability litigations, following Met Life v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:31 pm
Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 54 F.R.D. 412 (S.D.N.Y.1972), United States District Judge Frankel denied class certification in a TILA case because the potential $13 million award (130,000 credit card holders each receiving the $100 minimum penalty) "would be a horrendous, possibly annihilating punishment, unrelated to any damage to the purported class or to any benefit to defendant, for what is at most a technical and debatable violation of the Truth in Lending… [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 4:02 am
Ct. 596, 600 (1998)).The court also distinguished Frankel v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 2003 U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
The case arose from a dispute over the estate of Charles V. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:25 pm
United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996), to United States v. [read post]
