Search for: "Freedom Well Services L L C" Results 101 - 120 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Lévesque c. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Vigi Santé ltée c. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In England, competition law and policy as well as legal services regulation are both dealt at the same level of government. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Betül Durmuş, Strasbourg Observers: Cupiał v Poland: what could this case offer on religious upbringing? [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
  The key threshold to meet in asking a court to grant such injunctions is that they can prevent both existing infringement and future infringement provided they are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” (L’Oreal v eBay (2011 ECJ Case C-324-09). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Ben
Other defendants found liable included Capitol Records as well as Perry’s producers: Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They have a stronger claim to be publishers as well as traffic carriers. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:40 am by Marta Requejo
However, the ECJ has held that a lease contract is not a contract for services (Case C-533/07, Falco, Case C-469/12, Krejci Lager). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Marta Requejo
However, the ECJ has held that a lease contract is not a contract for services (Case C-533/07, Falco, Case C-469/12, Krejci Lager). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Instead, the status quo was largely preserved by the somewhat unsurprising conclusion that marks being used as trademarks (i.e. source identifiers) will ordinarily be treated as such.The case is however an interesting reminder that the US differs from the EU in the fact that it has codified, through the Lanham Act, an express parody exclusion for trademark infringement, whereas in the EU the courts have had to navigate the slightly more nebulous concept of "due cause" (Article… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
 The Court stressed that individuals such as Schrems, who believe that the Commission decision is invalid, as well as national authorities which have been vested with reviewing the matter of data protection, must both be given the right to bring that claim before the national courts. [read post]