Search for: "G. Stone"
Results 101 - 120
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
Quinta Jurecic and Benjamin Wittes discussed Roger Stone’s connections with the 2016 Trump campaign and what they reveal about President Trump's commutation of Stone's prison sentence. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:33 am
Richard G. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
District Court Judge Emmet G. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Stone responded, “I& [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Every day it seems as if there is another reminder that things are anything but regular in the department.To cite a few examples: Yesterday Congress heard testimony about pressure the Trump administration applied in Roger Stone’s case. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
Stone 19-1334Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
By Michael Douglas and Mhairi Stewart Andrew Bell is a leader of private international law in Australia. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:26 am
• Robert G. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:22 am
The EBA reasoned that particular interpretation of the Articles are not "carved in stone", but should be subject to later developments, "be they legal, or even practical or factual". [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Harold Ickes (center); Edward Taylor (left) LC[Longtime LHB readers will recall that for the exam in my legal history course I write an essay about some regulatory regime I did not cover in class and ask students to compare it with the ones we did. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:52 am
This meant that decisions G 2/12 and G 2/13 did not settle the meaning of Article 53(b) EPC once and for all. [read post]
14 May 2020, 10:27 am
In T 1063/18 (Pepper) the Board of Appeal found that Rule 28(2) EPC (amended by the Administrative Council (AC)) was in conflict with the prior interpretation of Article 53(c) EPC by the EBA in G 2/12 and G 2/13 (Broccoli/Tomato). [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:52 am
However, the Enlarged Board found that a particular interpretation which has been given to a legal provision can never be taken as carved in stone, because the meaning of the provision may change or evolve over time. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:01 pm
Nonetheless, as in any living constitution, these principles are not, as it were, carved in stone: They are best understood as a connected system of perpetually contending power centers, along the lines of what James Madison describes in Federalist No. 47. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
LEGAL HISTORY White, G. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:47 pm
Chancellor Andre G. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Austin several generations ago give us the idea of a speech act,[11] he provided the resources for thinking about the ways in which speech can exert actual influence, the sticks-and-stones crowd notwithstanding, for good or for ill. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
Trudeau, The Constitution and the People of Canada: An Approach to the Objectives of Confederation, the Rights of People and the Institutions of Government, which contains a draft of what would become these provisions under the Charter, (g) the right of a person not to be held guilty of an offence on account of any act or omission which at the time of its commission or omission did not constitute an offence, and the right of a person on being found guilty of an offence not… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
He said they are “systematically violating the rule of law,” which is ironic, given his decision this week to overrule career prosecutors and recommend a reduced sentence for President Trump’s ally Roger Stone. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 10:10 am
Engineered-type stone is now becoming trendy in the marketplace and as a result silica exposure continues as an emerging problem. [read post]
