Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. VIRGINIA"
Results 101 - 120
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Virginia and Hall v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Virginia and Hall v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Virginia 14-1248Issue: (1) Whether the claimed authority of a trial court to suspend a statutorily-prescribed sentence of life without parole for a juvenile offender ensures the proportionality required by the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment; and (2) whether the Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Brown (West Virginia); KPMG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
What about, ‘Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Clause? [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
The question for the Court in McFadden v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
” But the court noted that those decisions had relied on Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:34 am
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
Virginia is wrong. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
