Search for: "GORDON v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:30 am
Gordon, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found that this element was lacking because the trial court had in fact granted Gordon the right to seek admission of evidence at trial, despite the language in its order. 652 A.2d 317 (Pa. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:08 am
BC41059)) [see "TUOL" posts 3/4/11, 8/25/09], Kurt Cobain's widow again finds herself a defendant in a Los Angeles Superior Court libel suit, this time, filed by her former attorneys, Frederic Gordon and Rhonda Holmes.As reported by The Hollywood Reporter's THR, Esq. blog and the ABA Journal Law News Now blog, the San Diego-based Holmes & Gordon law firm, which represented Love in 2008-2009 in litigation seeking to recover assets allegedly… [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:15 am
Gordon & Breach Science Publishers v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:26 am
Image via WikipediaIn Jayme Gordon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
Gordon argued that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter because of Marshall v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
In Gordon v Town of Queensbury, 256 AD2d 784, the Appellate Division held that the probationary rules set out in a collective bargaining agreement trumped the probationary rules set in the regulations of the responsible civil service commission.The court rejected Michael Gordon’s claim that his termination by the Town of Queensbury before he completed his probationary period was made in bad faith because the Town failed to give him the written… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
Yesterday, we looked at Escape Airports (USA), Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP 2010 NY Slip Op 08981 ; Decided on December 7, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department in which Justice Kornreich was affirmed across the board. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am
Superior Court, (Cal. 1997). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
In most instances, however, the Court does appear to view it as a mitigating option that has good potential to reduce some of the harm of geographical separation between a parent and children.Nonetheless, the law regarding child mobility continues to be governed by the "best interests test" set out by the pre-Skype Supreme Court of Canada, in its 1996 ruling in Gordon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
This case arose from the Anne Marie Gordon perjury issues, and pursuant to those, the defendant’s breath test was suppressed in Seattle Municipal Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
CV 2010 052443 (Superior Court of AZ Maricopa County)). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
That case is Gordon v. [read post]
Judicial Watch Files New Court Brief in Legal Pursuit of Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s Security Detail
2 Aug 2010, 11:03 am
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed a new memorandum with the Superior Court for the State of Arizona in its legal pursuit of documents related to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s taxpayer-funded security detail (Judicial Watch, Inc. v City of Phoenix (Civil Action CV2010-015452)). [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Karakatsanis of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting as the Divisional Court, dated April 27, 2009.ARMSTRONG J.A. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
