Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT" Results 101 - 120 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm by Rick Garnett
It is unremarkably and uncontroversially “part of the deal” that if he wants to be in the business of cake creation, he can be expected, and required, to pay employees at least a particular wage, to submit his facility and equipment to regular health-and-safety inspections, and to keep records for tax purposes. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Realizing that the IP block did not stop the downloading, JSTOR then blocked a small range of addresses coming from MIT and discussed with the University how to stop the batch downloading. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The petitioner also raised a pro se argument that the non-unanimous verdict violated his constitutional rights. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Circuit: We think they mean "aid and abet" a criminal violation, which is clear and narrow enough to be constitutional. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm by John Elwood
Walmart suggested that Hedican apply for a lower-paying hourly management position, but he did not do so. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Prince of violating his copyrights by using Mr. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Loya, No. 07-2666 Denial of defendant's motion to suppress drug evidence seized from a valid vehicle stop is affirmed where: 1) under the totality of circumstances test, the trooper did not violate the Fourth Amendment when he expanded beyond the scope of the traffic stop, extended its duration by asking questions about contraband, and requested permission to search the vehicle; and 2) viewing defendant-driver and a passenger's interactions during the… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Proc. 2013-13), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
Soon after Janus, Alaska’s newly elected governor Michael Dunleavy requested a review which determined that the state lacked “clear and compelling” evidence that public employees had waived their First Amendment rights in agreeing to pay agency fees because (1) there was no indication union members were informed of the constitutional rights at stake; (2) there was no indication the consent was freely given; and (3) employees had a limited ability… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Richard Altieri, Benjamin Della Rocca
The former head of British intelligence agency MI6 advocated stopping the takeover, citing “deep rivalry” between China and Western nations over control of technology. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
King also sued the federal government for constitutional violations on individual-capacity claims against the agents under Bivens v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
At least one ethics expert said it may violate federal bribery statutes, which prohibit giving or offering anything of value to government officials in exchange for any acts or votes. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:00 am by Mark Herrmann
I try not to say anything that would violate the law, infringe a copyright or trademark, constitute defamation, or the like. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that “Evangelisto Ramos may well go on to win his argument that his 10-2 murder conviction in Louisiana violates the Constitution, but to do so, a majority of the court needs to grapple with how to get past a 1972 decision that condoned non-unanimous convictions at the state level. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Well, they'll have a knock down, drag out preemption fight on their hands - but that's the subject for another post - if and when the day comes.What we're going to discuss now is the secret weapon in municipal tort litigation where, as in the nuisance cases, the government is suing in a quasi-parens patriae posture - that is, where it's suing over response costs created by purported injuries to its citizens rather than for damage to government property… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
Thompkins requires advice that a suspect has the right to stop talking at any time in order to establish an implied waiver of Miranda rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Omarosa Manigault Newman Ordered to Pay $61,000 Over Trump-Era Ethics Violation HuffPost – Nina Golgowski | Published: 3/16/2022 Former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman was ordered to pay more than $61,000 after a federal judge said she “willfully” refused to file financial disclosure documents after being fired from the Trump administration. [read post]