Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT"
Results 101 - 120
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
Contract Period is 12 months, non-renewable. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Contract Period is 12 months, non-renewable. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
Carey: if Cox’s practice didn’t violate, what would? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Importantly the Supreme Court held that: The court had the jurisdiction to make a de-indexing order against the non-party search engine Google. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm
Contract Period is 12 months, non-renewable. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
If the State does not have such power, then the question becomes whether such a prohibition violates home-rule authority. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:50 am
Louis, Missouri's use of money bail to detain people before trial without any inquiry into their ability to pay and wheth [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
” Menendez seeks to revisit that determination, arguing that “there is a deep, acknowledged split among U.S. courts over the proper application of such out-of-state tolling statutes to residents who permanently leave the state, and thus become non-residents, after the events underlying the suit. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Operations cease – no ability to track accounts receivable, issue invoices, and pay bills and employees. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
This SEC work restriction is ironclad, codified in the SEC’s 2018 “Operations Plan Under A Lapse In Appropriations And Government Shutdown,” which states: “During the shutdown, employees who have not been designated as excepted may not volunteer to work without pay. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Schock moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the charges were based on supposed violations of ambiguous House of Representatives rules, which he argued violated the Constitution’s rulemaking clause and the speech-or-debate clause. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit: Limiting contributions from non-state residents violates the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
At least one ethics expert said it may violate federal bribery statutes, which prohibit giving or offering anything of value to government officials in exchange for any acts or votes. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The DOL issued a statement at the time of the resolution saying “The rule contradicted clear congressional intent—it narrowly limited the circumstances under which drug testing may be carried out and constrained a state’s ability to conduct a drug testing program under the act. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm
This year’s survey is set out below. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
With the increased focus on sexual harassment in the news, the apparent increased willingness by employees to report such behavior, and a climate where state and local governments are stepping up to support the movement, employers (including directors and officers) and insurers should recognize that an increase in sexual harassment claims and lawsuits may be inevitable. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
An alternative approach would be to ask why unions must act on behalf of non-dues-paying employees at all. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:01 pm
The conspirators used cryptocurrency to pay for the site, the government asserts, and emails connected to the domain name were also used in spearphishing efforts against the Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
” Thapar’s tenure as a prosecutor may have influenced his approach to criminal law cases, in which he has often, but not always, come out on the side of the government. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Smiley, 16-1189 Issues: (1) Whether the Fair Labor Standards Act prohibits an employer from using compensation paid to employees for non-compensable, bona fide meal breaks that it included in their regular rate of pay as a credit against compensation owed for work time; and (2) whether an agency’s interpretation of a statute advanced for the first time in litigation is entitled to Skidmore v. [read post]
