Search for: "GREGG v. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2017, 6:06 am
But the case the Times cites, Missouri v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:22 am
In 1976, in a series of decisions called the Gregg cases, the Court confirmed that capital punishment was legal in the United States, but under limited circumstances. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
(Just four years later, the Court would reinstate the death penalty with its 7-2 opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
(Just four years later, the Court would reinstate the death penalty with its 7-2 opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
In 1976, another Burger Court decision, Gregg v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 5:41 pm
See, e.g., Lancey v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 12:23 pm
After legislative revisions in the states, it was re-instituted in 1976 by a 7-2 vote in Gregg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Georgia (1972) on the grounds that it was capricious and discriminatory, followed four years later by restoring it in Gregg v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:47 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:42 pm
Gregg v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
State and Folsom v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
In an opinion by Judge Gregg Costa involving gift cards, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
For example, in Fletcher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:12 am
For the event, the Heard is partnering with the Native American Rights Fund and the Indian Legal Program at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
Gregg filed an objection to the designation. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
Georgia and Gregg v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
Donovan, Jr. and Gregg L. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:05 am
In Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]