Search for: "Gardner v. Nation" Results 101 - 120 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am by Charon QC
Blog: FamilyLore Twitter: @johnbolch Carl Gardner: Head of Legal blog Barrister, former government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog, Carl is a well known commentator on constitutional law and human rights issues – and a regular podcastee in my various series of podcasts. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
The present form of the Bill says that a judge “must” agree to closed material proceedings if the Secretary of State cites national security issues. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am by Wessen Jazrawi
 For more detail on the reasoning in the judgment as well as on the re-opening of proceedings, see Carl Gardner’s post on Head of Legal. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) – 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012). [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
K 3278 C35 2012 Civil liberties, national security and prospects for consensus : legal, philosophical, and religious perspectives edited by Esther D. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:16 am by Colin Murray
Abu Qatada’s application to the European Court (Othman v United Kingdom (App. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner was typically quick and right on Twitter yesterday to draw our attention to the relevant cases: Praha v Czech Republic, and Otto v Germany, neither of which is specifically about this three-month period but rather the six-month time limit for bringing your claim to the ECtHR in the first place. [read post]