Search for: "Gary v. Social Security" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm by Race to the Bottom
In 2021, current SEC Chair Gary Gensler asserted that the SEC considers crypto as a security under the “Howey Test,” derived from the Supreme Court case, SEC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The social media blog, Socially Aware, analyses the implications [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
And there are legitimate parallels between the vehicle safety crisis of the 1960s and today’s software security conundrum. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  Under Section 415(d), the adjustments are to be made pursuant to adjustment procedures which are similar to those used to adjust benefit amounts under Section 215(i)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act.Effective January 1, 2016, the limitation on the annual benefit under a defined benefit plan under Section 415(b)(1)(A) remains unchanged at $210,000. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
This should come as no surprise in these lean tax-revenue years given that the General Accounting Office recently estimated a loss of more than $2.7 billion per year in unpaid Social Security, unemployment and income tax as a result of this type of misclassification. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media TikTok has confirmed that some of its China-based employees can access information from American users. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:47 am by Trent Dykes
  Title V of the JOBS Act raised the limit on the number of shareholders a company may have before it triggers public reporting requirements from 500 to 2,000 accredited investors. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Socially Aware’s February newsletter is now available. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:52 am
[The case finally showed up on Westlaw on August 8:  People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Art Exhibition: Justice and Security: there is more than one truth. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
Lineker denied saying this and secured a clarification in the paper on page two. [read post]