Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 101 - 120
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
in relation to the recent judgment of the General Court (GC) in Group Nivelles v OHIM, T-15/13. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
O'Connor was appointed to the Court in 1981, as a result of President Ronald Reagan's 1980 campaign promise to select a female justice. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
As an example of the Court mistakenly taking a cautious approach, he cites Bowers v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Because generally there is no other court where advocacy can wield more far-reaching influence than the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
" (Guglielmi v Spelling-Goldberg Productions, 25 Cal 3d 860, 869, 603 P2d 454, 460 [1979] (Bird, C.J., concurring) (concurrence endorsed by four of seven Justices).) [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Unlike the conservative court of the 1980s and 1990s that helped form the worldview of much of the present legal academy, the current right-wing Court has abandoned any semblance of good faith normal-science cons [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan, and Jackson, like Justice Barrett, thought that the reflection on what comes next was unnecessary. [read post]
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
The Supreme Court released its opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
The Court of Appeal endorsed the decision of Ravenscoft v Herbert and New English Library Ltd [1980] RPC 193, where there was a finding of copyright infringement by the author of a novel who took a substantial part of a historical work, The Spear of Destiny. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 am
This significant case requires the Justices to apply the Fourth Amendment -- adopted in the 18th Century -- to the modern age.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
Ramadas Shenoy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
There is an obvious and material difference between being represented in proceedings which could result in a person’s expulsion from, or detention in the Commonwealth, being represented, and a person being represented for the purpose of the preparation of a report pursuant to s 62G of the Act, the weight given to which would be determined after the parties referred to in such report had the opportunity to cross-examine its author during the course of proceedings in the court in… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Other than a potential remand of the "fair use" question to the Federal Circuit, Google cannot realistically hope for anything positive to come out of yesterday's Supreme Court hearing in Google v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
As Justice Thomas noted in his partial dissent in Northwest Austin Municipal District No. 1 v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:21 pm
I think protesting targeted at a person's home is generally bad, because it's generally aimed more at intimidation than persuasion; I also think it would be ineffective in this instance, because Supreme Court Justices aren't easy to intimidate (and the publicity is likely to backfire against the protesters). [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Just to give one example, the Federal Circuit cited Roe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Fit the 1980s US data beautifully. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
