Search for: "Georges v. Exceptional Properties, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm by lawmrh
Frontier Theatres, Inc., 369 S.W.2d 299, 304-05 (Tex.1963) [2] Arrington v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
A final twist on prior user rights relates to a somewhat confusing “university exception”. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-652, which asks whether there is an exception to the prior exclusive jurisdiction rule when the United States brings a later-filed federal action seeking title to property within the jurisdiction of a state court; Bridges v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
It seems her co-inventor, George Anthiel, was a brilliant composer and inventor, who managed to synchronize numerous player pianos for a one-man show at Carnegie Hall. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
In In re the Estate of Johnny Vajgrt, Bill Ernst, Inc., Intervenor (IA Sup. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
October 28th of this month will mark the one year anniversary of the publication of the Anti-SLAPP Panel’s Report to the Attorney General on anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  However, because Class A players were eligible for the draft only if they had three years of professional experience, Kowalski’s promotion to Pueblo meant that he could not be drafted by another team in the 1947 amateur draft, and therefore was guaranteed to remain the property of the Dodgers for the following season (unless the Dodgers decided to trade or release him). [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm by Rantanen
Radio Eng’g Labs., Inc., 293 U.S. 1 (1934), in which Justice Cardozo made some broad statements about the presumption of patent validity, including that the challenger “bears a heavy burden of persuasion” and that the presumption cannot be overcome “except by clear and cogent evidence. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm by Robert Tanha
Thus, it was not open to reconsideration.Mullings v. 3574423 Canada Inc. and George Bozikis In this case, the Applicant sought an adjournment of the hearing scheduled at the last minute on the basis that that he had recently retained new counsel and that neither party to the proceeding had complied with the rules on disclosure of documents and witness lists.Turning to its own Practice Directions and to relevant caselaw, the Tribunal made clear that adjournments will only… [read post]