Search for: "German v. German"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day rejoices in the name Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-und-Vermögensberatung GmbH v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:14 am
At today's Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 12:10 am
UK rulings aren't binding precedent for German courts, but they are taken into account. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
I went to a German course on Word for Windows, since when I have often muttered to myself Vörtt. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Scheck v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
At the heart of the single biggest issue there's the total absence, from the statute as well as the government's rationale, of the second eBay v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:18 pm
Most European jurisdictions, including the German Basic Law recognise that there are limits. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:02 am
An ad for Galerie Voemel brags of its legacy:Die Galerie Vömel, mehr als ein halbes Jahrhundert in Düsseldorf ansässig, wurde von Alex Vömel - Geschäftsführer der legendären Galerie Flechtheim - gegründet und wird heute von seinem Sohn Edwin Vömel weiter geführt.Vor einigen Jahren ist die Galerie in das alte Stadtpalais gegenüber vom Stadtmuseum in die Karlstadt umgesiedelt.Die Galerie Vömel… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:28 am
The applicant filed a German trade mark for goods of class 7, 8 and 11, amongst others machine tools, packing machines and construction machines, as depicted below: The opponent lodged an opposition based on its German company name “eberth”. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:40 am
This morning Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) of the Mannheim Regional Court announced an order to stay a German Samsung v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:24 pm
Holger Kircher--held a Nokia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:28 am
They have a bi-lingual website and German-qualified staff, and are funding a fairly high-profile case, namely Elvis Presley v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
The German courts have ruled that EPC 2000 claims correspond to purpose-limited product claims and can be directly infringed via an act in s.9(1) German Patents Act 1980. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
August 14, 2007Re: The Federal Judiciary, Aping The German Judges, Allows The Government ToForce You to Die When You Are Sick.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:04 am
The same criticism was raised in a decision by Mr Justice Arnold in Dyson Limited v Vax Limited [2010] EWHC 1923 (see [30],[31]).The German case law now seems to be on the brink of changing. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:31 am
It's the exact opposite of what I typically see when eBay v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 10:41 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 am
This morning the Mannheim Regional Court ordered a stay of a Samsung v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
The Judge (Arnold J) applied the reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK and Solvay v Honeywell, holding that the claim advanced by the patentee was “concerned with” the validity of the German patent for the purposes of Article 24(4) of the Recast Brussels I Regulation, or at least “principally concerned with” that validity under Article 27 of the Regulation, and therefore the English court had no jurisdiction. [read post]
