Search for: "Gertz v. Gertz" Results 101 - 120 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by Ronald Collins
  Though the vote was five to four, this erroneous credit-rating defamation case has often been seen as little more that a minor refinement of the Court’s holding in Gertz v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
Greenmoss Builders (1985), the authors describe and analyze: (1) how and to what extent the holdings in Sullivan and Gertz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Jillian Stonecipher
Additionally, given the strong First Amendment protection for speech, which requires that actionable defamatory statements be made at least negligently (Gertz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:45 am by Eric P. Robinson
"In light of the recent evolution in the media industry and its shift toward online publication," the brief argues, "this case presents an opportunity for this Court to recognize that nontraditional journalists can claim the constitutional protections of Gertz [v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Nevertheless, I would argue that Sullivan is based on a faulty premise; namely, that all knowingly false factual assertions are devoid of constitutional value – a notion further reinforced by Gertz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:18 am by LTA-Editor
See Obsidian Finance, 2011 WL 5999334 at *5 (citing Gertz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
And a few other courts, including the Oregon Supreme Court, expressly held that such First Amendment defamation rules, and especially the Gertz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s the Summary of Argument: Consistent with this Court’s repeated observation that “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact,” Gertz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
We will assume that statements in this Court’s precedents that “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact,” Gertz v. [read post]