Search for: "Givens v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 53,444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII? – May 2024
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
Neither “negative” nor “passive”, they are substantive rights that require positive action by the state to ensure that they are given effect (Beaulac, at paras. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca/
Industries Counteract Class Action Independent Contractor Misclassification Claims: May ‎‎2024 IC Legal News Update‎
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Kennedy v. [read post]
Independent Contractor Compliance Legal Blog - http://independentcontractorcompliance.com/
The Confidentiality of Communications with Attorneys, Clients, and Experts. The Colorado Supreme Court Dispels Misconceptions.
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Evangelina Cantu
Garrigan v. [read post]
Spencer Fane Insights - https://www.spencerfane.com/insights/thought-leadership/
NIL Regulation: Can the NCAA Recover and Advance Its Own Fumble?
12 Jun 2024, 7:02 am by Howard Mulligan
Supreme Court decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
New Jersey Property Management Blog - https://www.offitkurman.com/resources/legal-blog/
A criminal "acquittal" is not proof of innocence of misconduct and does not preclude a proceeding in a civil forum such as an administrative disciplinary proceeding
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Joseph v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02985 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
A criminal "acquittal" is not proof of innocence of misconduct and does not preclude a proceeding in a civil forum such as an administrative disciplinary proceeding
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Joseph v Sewell 2024 NY Slip Op 02985 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
How the Inter-American Court Could Advance Protection for Climate-Displaced Individuals
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Felipe Navarro
Human Rights Committee’s decision in Teitiota v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
You can build a lot with LEGO – But also your own design law?
12 Jun 2024, 4:57 am by Marcel Pemsel
The referring court was right to state that the protection under Art. 8(3) CDR does not require the design to serve an aesthetic function. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Did the Defense Make Prison More Likely for Hunter Under the Sentencing Guidelines?
12 Jun 2024, 4:53 am by jonathanturley
It is also important to note that, after the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
Third-Party Pixel Tracking Technology Liability 
11 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm by David Klein
In Nienaber v. [read post]
Technology, Telemarketing and Internet Law Blog - https://kleinmoynihan.com/category/blog/
Meme Law Alert! Meme Use In Political Ad Isn’t Fair Use–Griner v. King
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Texas Must Pay FFRF $346K Attorneys' Fees by August 5
11 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Interpreting the Printed Matter Doctrine in Inter Partes Review
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
In Ioengine, LLC v. [read post]
Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/
Supreme Court Holds Legislature’s Case-Driven CEQA Amendments Require Judgment Upholding UC Berkeley’s 2021 Long-Range Development Plan EIR and People’s Park Housing Project Against Claims of Failures to Analyze Student “Social Noise” and Alternative Locations
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Will functional antibody inventions find new life in the US with mean-plus-function claims? (Ex parte Chamberlain, Appeal No. 2022-001944)
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
The Importance of Removal Restrictions in a Schedule F World
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Jennifer L. Selin
Fast forward almost 90 years, in Seila Law v. [read post]
RegBlog - https://www.theregreview.org/
Justice Barrett May Serve as a Bridge Between Ideological Sides in the Trump Presidential Immunity Case
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Suitability, reports in Family proceedings, and termination of existing accommodation
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
nearlylegal - http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog