Search for: "Goldstein Development Corp." Results 101 - 119 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
  An earlier constitutional objection to the public use of the taking was rejected in Goldstein v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:37 pm
The bank owned $105 million in problem construction and development loans, as of fourth quarter 2008... [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Sanders 718 Realty Broker 3 Malcolm Louis Adams Century 21 Milestone Realty Brokerage - Residential 3 ROBERT NAPOLITANO Capri Jet Realty Corp. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In the recently concluded Supreme Court term, the Justices heard oral argument in 70 cases, the fewest in more than half a century. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
The Court agreed to hear AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
”   One hour of oral argument will be scheduled in the combined cases of Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 pm
National Capital Revitalization Corp. - DC Court of Appeals on evidence of pretext in Public Use challenges Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Evens represented four research and development licensing companies in an amicus curiae brief filed in Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 4:06 am
Evens represented four research and development licensing companies in an amicus curiae brief filed in Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
International Trade Commissioner (moderator); Peggy Clarke, Powell Goldstein LLP"Queering International Law": Doris Buss, Carleton U.; Dianne Otto, U. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
" For an attorney appearing for McKesson Corp., the answer was a firm "yes. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar responded that the Solicitor General's "innovation test" was not a test, but rather a loose standard developed to describe the Court's opinion in Graham. [read post]