Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 3:19 am
“As a result of the decision in Pirtek (UK) Ltd. v Joinplace Ltd & others [2010] EWHC 1641 (Ch), when considering the enforceability of a post-termination restrictive covenant against competition in a franchise agreement, there are now two things that have to be considered: the franchisor’s interest in having his goodwill in the franchise protected as a matter of common law; and, the franchisor’s interest in having his know-how and the assistance he has given… [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:05 pm
Sun World International Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Facts: Husband and Wife divorced after 26 years of marriage. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:47 am
True Organic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
(For more on that, see our post on Los Angeles Unified School District v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:17 pm
The facts of the 2019 Federal Court decision in Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v Bega Cheese Limited were far from simple. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:17 pm
The facts of the 2019 Federal Court decision in Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v Bega Cheese Limited were far from simple. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:47 pm
At least the Plaintiffs in a recent Federal Court decision, Salam Toronto Publications and Mohsen Seyed Taghavi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The Opponent however argued that this did not automatically mean that the Applicant owns the goodwill attached to all trademarks containing “HARVARD”, claiming that it owned goodwill attached to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” as a result of long use.The Applicant countered by arguing that it owned all goodwill attached to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” because each Harvard Club is/was a trademark licensee of the Applicant, and thus the… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:12 pm
The case, 21st Century Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 7:21 am
Authentic Apparel Group, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:45 pm
Kahr v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:43 am
In Optical Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
., Ltd v nunufish.com . [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 am
The Canadian Court of Appeal looked to settle this point after a first instance decision sometime in late 2015.The case of Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Luckily, the European Court of Justice answered this question over a month ago.The case of Iron & Smith v Unilever dealt with a national application for the mark "be Impulsive" in Hungary, lodged by Iron & Smith. [read post]
