Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Grounds"
Results 101 - 120
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
The government struggles to distinguish Hosanna-Tabor on the ground that it arises in “the special context of autonomy for churches and religious institutions. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:10 am
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (1972), Thompson and the government argue that the phrase “persons . . . aggrieved” encompasses third-party victims who suffer injury when an employer violates another employee’s Title VII rights. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Allstate Insurance Co., February 13, 2015, Hardiman, T.) [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
Co., 141 F.3d 1310 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:26 am
Co., 38 AD3d 321 [1st Dept. 2007]). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
That means the self-insured religious corporation gets the cost savings of its employees’ actual contraceptive use—good for the bottom line! [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:01 pm
In the realm of an insured employee benefit plan, this is a common occurrence as insurers typically act as claims administrators and the funding source of ERISA benefits. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Federal Insurance Co., 499 F.3d 692, 700 (7th Cir. 2007), holding that the defendant's "motive for making the change is irrelevant. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm
[v], which alleged that Pfizer and the individual directors, officers, and employees of Pfizer made false representations and omissions regarding the cardiovascular risks associated with two of Pfizer’s drugs—Celebrex and Bextra. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Under federal regulations that implement the ACA, employers that offer health insurance to their employees must provide plans that include zero-co-pay coverage for contraception. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:23 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
(pg. 12) - A company employee adjuster, independent adjuster, attorney, investigator, or other persons acting on behalf of an insurer that needs access to an insured or claimant or to the insured property that is the subject of a claim must provide at least 48 hours’ notice to the insured or claimant, public adjuster, or legal representative before scheduling a meeting with the claimant or an onsite inspection of the insured property. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
; and (2) Is the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) regulations the “least restrictive means” to accomplish the “compelling” government interest—that female employees receive contraceptive service insurance at no cost—as required under RFRA? [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Co., US 1st Cir. (1/17/13)ERISA, Government & Administrative Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiff was a partner in a medical practice where she served as a staff anesthesiologist. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Federal Trade Commission 13-1045Issue: (1) Whether the Court’s analysis of equitable jurisdiction in Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
Employees v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
We are inclined to agree with Chief Justice Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
Company controllers justifiably may need to be able to terminate the employment of owner-employees for certain types of serious misconduct, and to expel owners who are no longer employees. [read post]
