Search for: "Grant Sullivan" Results 101 - 120 of 1,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 8:29 am by Matt C. Bailey
On April 27, 2010, Northern District Court Judge, Claudia Wilken, certified a proposed class action in Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Ever since the Supreme Court's cert grant in the juve LWOP cases of Graham and Sullivan (basics here and here), I have been thinking about ways the  Justices might breathe some new life into a troublesome modern Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
A contemporaneous buy-sell agreement granted the company the option to repurchase the stock if Sullivan ceased to be employed by Troser. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:19 am by Zoe Tillman
District Judge Emmet Sullivan granted a preliminary injunction (PDF) to the campaign, barring DemStore from using the trademark or any image that "is confusingly similar" and engaging in any behavior that might mislead consumers into thinking the site is affiliated with the campaign. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 9:27 am
Sullivan granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment of non-infringement in plaintiff Enzo Biochem, Inc.' [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
We also grant that if every lawyer who finds an accused's alleged conduct repugnant refuses to represent the accused, the system could be in jeopardy. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
This might be taken for granted now, but it’s the sort of rhetorical twist that slips in unnoticed. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell client memorandum, and relates to an appeal in the case of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:26 am
Some recent posts on juve LWOP and the  Graham and Sullivan cases: SCOTUS grants cert in Sullivan, juve LWOP case The (unpreserved?) [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 12:14 pm by Stacy K. Marcus
In his grant of summary judgment in favor of A&F Judge O’Sullivan noted the press release "explicitly attempted to disassociate the plaintiff’s name from the brand" by offering Sorrentino "substantial payment" not to wear their clothing on the show. [read post]