Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 101 - 120 of 3,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2016, 3:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court thus held that the correct interpretation of s 83 was that grants of leave to remain had to total more than 12 months counting from the date of refusal of the application. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:19 am by Nicole Mazzocco
Department of Corrections, No. 140273, for failure to pay the partial filing fee. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:24 am by Matthew Nelson
In a case that may have significant ramifications for the criminal law bar, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The licensing agency still maintains the ultimate control whether to grant the license. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:08 am by Howard Friedman
Michigan Department of Corrections, 2014 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by AYESHA CHRISTIE, MATRIX
First, he gave guidance on the correct approach to the application of art 8 to the removal of non-settled migrants (i.e. persons without a right of residence). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Malachowski v Daly ; 2011 NY Slip Op 06720 ; Decided on September 30, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Fourth Department  is a divorce legal malpractice case from Utica, and it demonstrates two things. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
  Chacko v New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services In a recent case handled by the Law Offices of Kevin P. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
The Court granted cert. in three cases, and will hear a fourth: Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:17 am
The plaintiff...appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to vacate, correct or modify an arbitration award and granting the application to confirm the award filed by the defendant.... [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:31 am by Howard Friedman
Donat, (9th Cir., Dec. 22, 2010), the 9th Circuit held that monetary damages are not available under RLUIPA against the Nevada Department of Corrections or officials acting in their official capacity. [read post]