Search for: "Grant v. Maxwell"
Results 101 - 120
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Prelude to Next Week’s Oral Argument: Henry and Stearns on Commerce Games and the Individual Mandate
24 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
Litigants, judges, and academic commentators have focused on whether the Court’s “economic activity” test, as set forth in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
(Borchers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm
Concepcion, Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
Sebelius, 11-83, which had been relisted once, moves into the “hold” column awaiting decision in the newly granted Salazar v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Andrea Bottorff of JURIST covers the Court’s grant in Salazar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:58 am
Maxwell: It is a regrettable reality that some federal judges like to second-guess state courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
Maxwell. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:24 am
Maxwell (10-1548). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
Maxwell, No. 10-1548, a noncapital case where the Ninth Circuit granted relief to a murder convict whose claim had been found without merit by the California state courts. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Florida v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
In an opinion issued after the judge granted Maxwell’s motion to suppress, the King Court resolved this issue. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (apparently relisted eight times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:19 am
As The Court stated; "Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendants were under no obligation to plead, as an affirmative defense, the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory notice of claim requirement (see Laroc v City of New York, 46 AD3d 760, 761; Maxwell v City of New York, 29 AD3d 540, 541; Lynch v New York City Tr. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (seven times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Maxwell, 10-1548 (relisted six times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:13 am
In footnote 4, the Eighth noted the then-recent grant of certiorari in Tolentino v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The chairman went to great lengths to ensure that the formalities of debate were meticulously observed Regular readers of this weblog will recall that, following the United Kingdom Supreme Court's recent decision to grant permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal's controversial ruling on the application of the "temporary copying" exception in NLA v Meltwater [2011] EWCA Civ 890 [noted by the IPKat here; criticised by Lionel Bently here], Baker… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Maxwell, 10-1548 (Ninth Circuit, fifth relist), and Hardy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Florida Florida v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (Ninth Circuit, fourth relist), and Hardy v. [read post]
