Search for: "Graves v. Powers"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 5:16 am
Unfortunately, however, the book seems to have staying power, and is even being cited favorably in the academic literature by people who should know better. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:34 am
Absolute power corrupts, its usage without any checks is the cornerstone of evil. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:06 am
The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
Schrödinger would be rolling in his grave. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
They say that the defendants' failure to close down parts of the CAWS to avert the crisis creates a grave risk of harm, in violation of the federal common law of public nuisance, see American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
This wide delegation of power naturally creates concerns about fairness. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
National Security Judge Shedd’s dissent, which was joined by Judges Niemeyer and Agee, charged that the majority opinion disregards the “potentially grave consequences for our country. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:59 pm
" But Kavanaugh does not consider the possibility that concentrating even greater power in the hands of a single person — the president — also poses grave risks. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Moreover it has grave implications for the victims of that violence. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
Yesterday, in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 5:51 pm
That case, Merrill v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:13 am
The landmark judgment in the Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:55 pm
Check the NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 10:53 am
[Summa Holdings v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:58 pm
” Pennekamp v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am
In Thacker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 1:10 pm
Today is the tenth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:56 am
In the words of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
power designed to promote such a goal…” (quoting United States v. [read post]
