Search for: "Gray v. People of the State of California" Results 101 - 120 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Family Code section 1100 states that "either spouse has the [right of] management and control of the community personal property, ..., as the spouse has of the separate estate of the spouse. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Family Code section 1100 states that "either spouse has the [right of] management and control of the community personal property, ..., as the spouse has of the separate estate of the spouse. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
Triumph Learning LLC (TTABlog) CollegeSource – Ninth Circuit doesn’t believe defendant lacked contacts with California: CollegeSource, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Gray on Claims) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Pet-door patent dispute over jurisdiction clarified: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
Scott Michelman, of California (Jay Rorty, of California, & John Reinstein with him) for the defendant. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
")Frank Zappa - "Brown Shoes Don't Make It" ("Gotta meet the Guerneys and a dozen gray attorneys. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Advertising-based content distribution patent fails Bilski test: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm by Marshall Isaacs
Another casualty of the crisis was California’s Governor, Gray Davis. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also amazing: almost half of people who buy counterfeits end up buying the real thing. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Newline Cinema (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit vacates Catcher in the Rye injunction – applies eBay: Salinger v Colting (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit dismisses claims by Ms Lapine that Jessica Seinfeld’s ‘Deceptively Delicious’ was a rip off of her recipe book (The IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Copyright transfer termination notices subject California copyright heirs to jurisdiction in New York: Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]