Search for: "Green v. CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT" Results 101 - 120 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Sonia Sotomayor is up next with the opinion in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
A correct statement of the law would that “tester status does not preclude standing. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The Greens Senator is suing over comments made by a former senator. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The most high profile media law story of the week concerned the discontinuance of Sir Philip Green’s libel action against the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
.), Michael Green, and Yoshimasa Hayashi, and a panel discussion involving Green, Kenichiro Sasae, and several other discussants. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am by INFORRM
” [96] The Judge then expressed his concern over whether setting the bar so high is correct or justifiable any longer. [read post]