Search for: "H&R Block, Inc. v. Block, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff.   [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Earlier I posted about the European Commission’s Communication on Illegal Content Online. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:59 pm
The AG's office also previously sued also sued Option One and its parent H&R Block alleging unfair, deceptive and predatory lending practices. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 185–86 (5th Cir. 1981) (permitting plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously because the lawsuit revealed their unpopular personal beliefs); Choice, Inc. of Tex. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
The relevant factors to be considered include:a. the quality and quantity of the material taken;b. the extent to which the respondent’s use adversely affects the applicant’s activities and diminishes the value of the applicant’s copyright;c. whether the material taken is the proper subject-matter of a copyright;d. whether the respondent intentionally appropriated the applicant’s work to save time and effort; ande. whether the material taken is used in the same or a similar… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
[H]owever, federal courts may not engage in judicial activism. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  They can block you, take your money, or block your monetization for 20 seconds of video in a 40 minute video. [read post]