Search for: "HASH v STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
He stated from all of his analysis that he had no doubts about the MediaSentry information and believed that sublimeguy14 was distributing the entire file with that hash code. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
, United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:36 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
And, casebooks will probably add this decision to the early chapters on the right to exclude–alongside State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:38 am
Stated this way, the opinion shouldn’t do much extra damage beyond Roommates.com. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
When IDFP makes a match of hash values for a known pornographic file, the suspected email is reported to the NCMEC CyberTipline, pursuant to 18 U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:56 pm
Back in 2020, we covered National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:55 pm
(This was hashed out in the district court in Blizzard v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
In DeBenedetto v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
K-Beech, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:17 am
Thom Tillis, R-N.C., former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel and former USPTO Director David Kappos, who stated that the “misinterpretation of Section 101 of our patent laws has created an unintelligible hash. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
by Dennis Crouch KPN v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:58 am
Rounds v. [read post]
