Search for: "HAYNES V US"
Results 101 - 120
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2014, 1:21 am
Justices French, Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel, in the majority's decision, saw that, on the face of the evidence given that the marks have are not merely descriptive, and Cantarelle got to keep their trademarks. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:03 pm
Haynes, 301 F.3d 669, 677 (6th Cir. 2002). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:36 am
In Love v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am
Haynes Investments, LLC (Lending Operations)United States of America v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:26 am
The High Court has recently commented about the usefulness of constructive trusts. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:18 pm
In IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] HCA 14, the High Court has decided (6-0) that IceTV's use of some of Nine Network's time and title information obtained from aggregated program guides did not infringe Nine's copyright in its weekly schedules. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am
Mgmt. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
Judge Catharina Haynes wrote the majority opinion, for herself and Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bond v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:59 am
Matal concluded the PTAB provides reliable review American manufacturers need, saying recent cases like VLSI v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:37 am
Relying on Harris v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:53 pm
Fund v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Therefore, the Full Federal Court’s decision in Milwell v Olympic would appear to have been wrongly decided. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:45 am
Haynes v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 7:52 am
Most recently, in Haynes v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
Fund v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:49 am
Here is the complaint in Chicago Transit Authority Retiree Health Care Trust v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:40 pm
In Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. [read post]
