Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 101 - 120 of 1,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Platforms (Defamation Amendment) Bill which would hold a social media company accountable for defamation if they failed to or refused to divulge the identity of an account holder who made defamatory statements on their platform has passed its first stage in the Dail. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Phil Dixon
Findings of fact failed to resolve material conflicts in the evidence from suppression hearing; denial of motion to suppress vacated and remanded for new findings State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  When none arrived, she accepted the offer of a retainer by a recently created holding company, Aviation Corporation (AVCO), assembled from scores of small carriers by two great New York investment banks. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
The American Bankers Association, American Financial Services Association, California Financial Services Association, and Consumer Bankers Association have filed a joint amicus brief with the California Supreme Court in Pulliam v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 Beyond all of that, as my colleague David Hasen, who also teaches tax law at the Univesity of Florida, pointed out in an email:"There are plenty of exceptions to the realization requirement already, including for dealers in securities, holders of certain financial contracts, holders of off-shore investment funds and certain income of controlled foreign corporations. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
 Interestingly, as part of the overview of stablecoins, the Report highlights in a footnote that stablecoins should be eligible for deposit insurance at the holder level if the stablecoin issuer deposits fiat currency reserves at an FDIC-insured bank and in a manner that meets statutory requirements for “pass-through” deposit insurance coverage. [read post]