Search for: "HUNTER v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 1,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm by Russell Knight
Hunter’s Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816) However, federal courts cannot simply trump any state court decision. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:46 pm by Steve Lash
Supreme Court’s decision in Hunter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Hunter, 299 N.C. 29, 40, 261 S.E.2d 189, 196 (1980). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at 1317, quoting Matter of Young v Village of Gouverneur, 145 AD3d 1285, the court declined to disturb the penalty imposed, Petitioner's dismissal from his position. * The record contains a copy of ACC's written code of conduct and a certification by Petitioner acknowledging its receipt. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at 1317, quoting Matter of Young v Village of Gouverneur, 145 AD3d 1285, the court declined to disturb the penalty imposed, Petitioner's dismissal from his position. * The record contains a copy of ACC's written code of conduct and a certification by Petitioner acknowledging its receipt. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
and mens rea (did Twitter have a culpable mental state?) [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:59 am by Michael Erdle
Justice Hunter stated: [6] In this case, I am not satisfied that any of the questions of law constitute extricable errors of law justifying appellate intervention. [read post]