Search for: "Hairston" Results 101 - 119 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
  But the maximum consecutive sentence you can get is, well… ask Marquis Hairston, who’d doing 134 years for three home invasion robberies. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
And that doesn't even include "de facto" life sentences, like the 134 years Marquis Hairston got for a trio of home invasion robberies two years ago. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:38 am by John L. Welch
Hairston RetiresUSPTO Seeks Comments on Trademark Bullies You Have KnownEdge Games Crashes in Trademark Suit Against Electronic ArtsMark Your TTAB Calendar: Webinar on Fraud, November 10, 2010Updated Case Book: "Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Law" by Prof. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:11 pm by cdw
Kenneth Hairston, No. 566 CAP (Penn 12/28/2009) Relief denied as trial counsel defaulted the appeal by not timely filing either a notice of appeal or the appropriate post trial motions; should make an interesting PCRA application. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  But if they’re imposed consecutively, the sky’s the limit, as Marquis Hairston found out in 2007 when the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed his 134-year sentence for a trio of armed house invasions. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Hairston, Fourth Circuit: Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to possession with intent to distribute narcotics and sentenced to 324 months imprisonment. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:01 am by MBettman
This court’s precedent in Hairston requires that each individual sentence be evaluated, so if each individually offers a meaningful possibility of release, that is good enough. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
Hairston, upholding a 134-year sentence, but in that case the court acknowledged that the “sole issue” was the Eighth Amendment; the statute wasn’t even raised. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am by MBettman
Hairston, 2004-Ohio-969 (“If [the statute] is ambiguous, we must then interpret the statute to determine the General Assembly’s intent. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:10 am by Russ Bensing
Hairston found out a few years back when the Supreme Court affirmed his 134-year sentence for three home invasions, Lanzinger noting uncomfortably in concurrence that the court was approving ““noncapital life sentences. . . in situations where no one is killed or seriously injured. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
-based firm known as Alexander, Bearden, Hairston & Marks had 37 lawyers and a client roster that included NationsBank, the D.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Hairston, No. 05-5178 Sentence for drug and weapons charges is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court violated Rule 11 by not informing defendant before accepting his guilty pleas that he faced a mandatory fifteen-year minimum sentence; 2) the error was not harmless; and 3) vacating all of defendants guilty pleas is the proper remedy. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]