Search for: "Hale v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2006, 4:05 am
Cases brought against Ford by Hale and the other three passengers are still pending, so Ford's bill for Hale's carelessness is only going to go up. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
If France v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:01 am
Here: Dollar General Corp v MI Band of Choctaw Indians_HALE An excerpt: The State has joined in support of the Petitioner despite the fact that the State of Mississippi has made the policy decision that on-reservation torts arising in Mississippi should not consume State resources and are better addressed by tribal institutions. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenthal v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am
Lady Hale reasoned that the present case is one of fraud. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
Lady Hale, dissenting, stated that what has to be considered is whether the benefit cap as it applies to lone parents can be justified independently of its discriminatory effects. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
In Kitroser v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Baroness Hale states that the phrase ‘would be reasonable for him to continue to occupy’ looks to the future as well as describing a current state. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 6:19 am
Citing Hale v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Lady Hale (Lord Carnwath agreeing) dissented in relation to A. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
Lady Hale stated that: “The question is whether, in the light of the words used, their context and the purpose of the legislation, Parliament must have meant the Crown to be bound. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:13 am
The Court held that they should depart from the decision in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 1 AC 484. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
However she stated since this was not a remedy sought by the appellants the Court should invite further submissions before finally deciding the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
