Search for: "Hale v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
” “California courts may exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents ‘on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
Hale v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Parliament had given the Ministers permission to deal with a future situation where patients became entrapped in medium-secure units as they had been in the State Hospital, and a discretion to go further, to deal with other kinds of unit, if it ever became desirable. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment This case (see yesterday’s summary) is illustrative of two misconceptions about rights that we are all in thrall to from time to time. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Seal v United Kingdom (Application no. 50330/07) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected the claim of a man detained by the police for 9 days under mental health law. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Requests Ronan Lavery QC not abuse Lady Hale’s politeness. 11:27: Ronan Lavery QC submits the Government’s policy would be constitutional. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:54 am
For judgment, please download: [2012] UKSC 22 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII UPDATE: Further statement Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority 30 May 2012 Following this morning’s judgment by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority, Ms Rose (counsel for the appellant, Mr Assange) has indicated that she may… [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 11:52 am
See McGuire, Craddock, Strother & Hale, P.C. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 8:02 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
SHELLE HALE, __ N.J. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
