Search for: "Hardy v. Mays"
Results 101 - 120
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 10:35 am
Hardy, a pre-HIPPA case, held that whatever privacy rights a patient may have in his or her medical records, it did not include the results of blood-alcohol testing by hospital personnel. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:13 pm
Hardy and State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:13 pm
Hardy and State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:07 am
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am
Still, donors to either “charity” may not really care where the revenues go if they can overstate the car’s value on their tax returns. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
A. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:37 pm
(Cohen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6664, Hardy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:27 am
Lawyers may not state or imply another lawyer is part of the advertising firm if the statement or implication is untrue. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 8:44 am
However, a landmark 2010 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
See George & Co., 575 F.3d at 398 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[e]vidence of only a small number of instances of actual confusion may be dismissed as de minimis. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
We had a guest post in this blog providing a descriptive comment on the decision of the two judge Bench in Union of India v Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc (2018: SCI)("Hardy I") referring the matter to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 11:25 am
The United States Supreme Court is a hardy institution. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:03 pm
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:54 am
Act V: For unclear reasons, the situation suddenly gets publicity this week. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am
(Supreme Court, 01 May 2018)Brief facts: Petition filed by Union of India (appellant) against Hardy Exploration (respondent) under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 (hereinafter “the Act”) challenging the legality, validity and correctness of the arbitral award made in favour of respondent in an international commercial arbitration proceeding between the parties. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Lord Hardie, the Inquiry chairman, requested sight of them. [read post]
