Search for: "Hardy v. Small" Results 101 - 120 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by David Lat
Only a hardy (or foolhardy) few, I bet, dare take the bar based on what they learned in school. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Australia In the case of Hardie v Herald and Weekly Times [2016] VSCA 103, the Court of Appeal of Victoria dismissed an appeal on liability in respect of an allegation that the plaintiff was a brothel madam and increased the damages from Aus$90,000 to $250,000. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:31 am by Al Saikali
New regulatory activity may help companies experience fewer ransomware attacks and could impact whether ransoms can be paid to threat actors. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
Hardy (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 89, 57 O.O.2d 284, 276 N.E.2d 247; and State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
The FTC always says it’s a small agency, but it’s still the freaking U.S. government and has more resources than any company it targets. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
Vendor quotes upon which a contractor did not rely,[18] vendor quotes with unacceptable delivery dates,[19] and vendor quotes from untested sources have been found to constitute cost or pricing data that must be disclosed.[20] Even small impacts on price – less than two-tenths of a percent – have been found to be significant for TINA purposes.[21] Adequate Disclosure Cost or pricing data must be disclosed to the contracting officer.[22] Disclosure to other Government… [read post]
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
”Much of that grumbling stems from Torreón’s “foundational myth” as a city of hardy immigrants who conquered the desert, said Javier Garza, a former newspaper editor in the city.Before the massacre, Chinese migrants opened a bank, built a tram connecting Torreón with the neighbouring city of Gómez Palacios and ran most of the local laundries. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm by David Jacobson
Expand All December 2010 (26) 29: ASX-listed company trading policies 29: Privacy case notes 9-24 of 2010 29: Compliance Training and Procedure Reviews 29: FOI Guidelines 29: APRA consolidates prudential standards 29: Proposed amendments to AML/CTF Rules 29: ASIC guide on insurance for trustee companies 29: Improving financial reports: ASIC’s suggestions 28: Website update 28: Archived Posts Sitemap: Australian Regulatory Compliance Review 21: Looking… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Verio went from small to large to public to private in four years. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
But you know the sort of thing : carbolic smoke ball tea-towels, unfunny cufflinks, inappropriate gavels and other assorted accessories of pompous try-hardiness. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Rob Robinson
Peck’s Court - bit.ly/wLHPAm (Michael Roach) Sedona Conference Issues International Principles On Discovery And Data Protection - bit.ly/AmMSng (Steven Bennett) Statistics for eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/zAQKlY (@OrangeLT) Technology on Trial: Predictive Coding - bit.ly/yi98hv (Sean Doherty) Technology: Spoliators and the Sanctions they Receive - bit.ly/ybjDws (Barry Shelton) The Art of Production – How to Minimize Risk When Replying To A… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]