Search for: "Harmon v. Holder"
Results 101 - 120
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am
Even so, the legislation does leave a great deal of room for national harmonization in this respect. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am
That is because those provisions apply:Subject to the subsequent harmonization of copyright at the level of EU law, effected in particular by the InfoSoc Directive, as interpreted by the CJEU;Not to works of applied art in general, but only to designs registered in accordance with that Directive or to C [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am
Even so, the legislation does leave a great deal of room for national harmonization in this respect. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
It has been held that the right holder did not have an obligation to provide URL’s for the content that the platform should remove in its take down request and a simple indication in the title of the video would be sufficient. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:18 am
SPC has supported national innovation policy through issuing an outline on judicial intellectual property (IP) protection, hearing and closing 683,000 IP cases, working on strategies to deal with the issue for both Chinese and foreign IP holders that in China, IP infringement is low cost but protecting IP rights is high cost, trying the Jordan case and the Huawei v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
Across the pond, European lawmakers are considering a similar proposal to harmonize trade secrets protection throughout the EU’s 28 members states. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
One does not develop a help desk from the bottom up--nor necessarily with a view to enlarging the primacy of human rights holders who tend to bear the consequences of adverse human rights impacts.[12] Instead, it tends to be more efficient to target those collective organs into which positive responsibility for the care and protection of human rights harms bearers authority are vested. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Expressive content of photos can be entirely unaltered—Dillon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Conflicts of Interest New Item 1603(b) requires the SPAC to disclose any actual or potential material conflict of interest between (1) the sponsor or its affiliates or the SPAC’s officers, directors or promoters, and (2) unaffiliated security holders of the SPAC. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
