Search for: "Harris v. Hill" Results 101 - 120 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
” Also at ACSblog, Jessie Hill looks ahead to Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Harris, a case involving the preemptive effect of the Federal Meat Inspection Act. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am by Robert Kreisman
Supreme Court cast doubt on the fees in another Illinois case, Harris v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am by jonathanturley
Below is my Hill column on what to expect in a post-Roe world. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
” The Spectator has compiled a list of five instances where Harry himself is responsible for breaching the privacy and breaking the confidences of his own family. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Kali Borkoski
” At Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro reports on an amicus brief recently filed by (among others) the Cato Institute urging the Court to grant cert. in Harris v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Welch Behringer on Harry S Truman and the Federal Records Act (WaPo). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:03 am by Rebecca Jeschke
SAN FRANCISCO - Stephanie Lenz and Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG) today announced they have amicably resolved Lenz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:19 pm by Kent Scheidegger
This movie has played on the Supreme Court Channel more times than the Harry Potter movies have played on cable TV.In Shoop v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am by Steve Hall
  Here's the beginning: No one saw Rob Will shoot and kill Harris County Deputy Sheriff Barrett Hill in the still-black morning hours in a Houston bayou on Dec. 4, 2000. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Coakley — constitutionality of state law banning anti-abortion protesters near clinics; alternative question on continuing validity of Hill v. [read post]