Search for: "Harris v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
More broadly, income subject to substantial information reporting requirements includes pensions, annuities, interest income, dividend income, unemployment compensation, and taxable Social Security benefits. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Virginia – used the power of judicial review to raise the professional standards of American public administrators in the fields of education, law enforcement, electoral administration, and family law. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The Biden-Harris Administration’s release of the United States’ second National Action Plan (NAP) on Responsible Business Conduct reflects a whole-of-government commitment to strengthen RBC. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has also published a blog post outlining what Musk should do to protect privacy and security for Twitter users. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Press Gazette had a piece “Why Harry and Megan are better equipped to protect their privacy in England then Canada”. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The suit is one of numerous suits the EEOC is pursuing under the Biden-Harris Administrations strong emphasis on civil rights and other employment discrimination laws. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2022, the BBC offered a public apology and agreed to pay damages to the former nanny of Prince William and Prince Harry following the “fabricated” and “false and malicious” allegations made by Martin Bashir that Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Alexandra Pettifer, had an affair with Prince Charles, in order to secure his world-famous 1995 interview with Princess Diana. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Berryhill, 17-1606, presents a question only a lawyer could love: whether a decision by the Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” — the body that hears disability benefits claimants’ appeals from administrative law judge decisions — that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]