Search for: "Head v. Sullivan*"
Results 101 - 120
of 310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
" According to the newspaper, the Dutch man is facing charges of insult, insulting an official, and insulting a friendly head of state. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018)Last year I taught a course on Corporate Social Responsibility Law for the very first time (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Now the Senate will be considering another judge for elevation to the Supreme Court, a judge who may be even more inclined to want to overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
I asked whether we should have the letter and writer assessed as a possible threat, but the justice shook his head. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
Citing to US v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Two months later, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
According to corporate finance experts at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, the 2011 SEC CF Guidance jump-started a new era of cyber-disclosure in public company filings, which most public companies have now already integrated into their SEC disclosure processes: “Following the [2011 SEC CF Guidance’s] Release, many public companies included additional cybersecurity-related disclosures in their annual and quarterly reports, often in the form of risk factors, as well… [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 9:15 am
(credit: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images) One of the highlights of this week's Waymo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
See also Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:38 pm
Whren v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:31 am
Disparate impact arose as a means of overcoming a proof problem, where something appears to have been discriminatory, but it’s hard, if not impossible, to prove it because of the inability to show what happened in another person’s head. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
The will was done up like a traditional will, i.e. with the heading ‘last will and testament’, and it contained many of the traditional provisions of a will, like the appointment of an executor and a replacement executor. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:46 pm
The reason is that the President is a public official and under the New York Times v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Murray v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
In Lucia v SEC, the D.C. [read post]
