Search for: "Head v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:09 am
This would seem to turn the purpose of the statute on its head. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Des Moines | United States Courts Criminal Cases | United States Courts [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
“It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:40 am
The United States has filed a complaint in the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
United States. [read post]
