Search for: "Heard v. City of New York" Results 101 - 120 of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No.… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No.… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:00 am
City of New York -- concerns a plaintiff who injured himself on a pothole on a New York City street. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
Cities compete to be designated as sites where global arbitration matters are heard. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”They certainly put Lincoln Place in its place.# # #DECISIONCollins v 527 Lincoln Place, LLC [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
On June 9, 2005, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department heard the case of Isaiah Brown, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
In the unlikely event of a dispute or controversy between us, and subject to the requirements of applicable New York law, you agree that any dispute or controversy between us or arising under or relating to or connected with this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration in the City of White Plains, County of Westchester, State of New York . . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State has codified the doctrine of forum non conveniens as CPLR 327.* In Employees Retirement System for the City of Providence v Rohner, in which Credit Suisse Group AG, was named as a "Nominal Defendant", the Appellate Division opined  "There is no credible argument that a substantial nexus between this action and New York is lacking". [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:37 pm
The child was born about a month after they had gone to Vermont to form a civil union, and two months after they had registered as domestic partners with New York City. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
Like every other court in New York State, Supreme Court may not convict a defendant of a felony absent compliance with the indictment and waiver of indictment provisions in article I, § 6 of the New York Constitution as was held in People v Wiltshire. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:38 am by Patricia Salkin
As the court explained, while the appeal in this case was pending, the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Mestecky v City of New York that the New York City Charter only required “a single reasonable attempt by a DOB inspector to personally deliver the [notice of violation] at the premises. [read post]