Search for: "Henkels "
Results 101 - 120
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2023, 5:18 am
Christoph Henkel (Drake University Law School), Prof. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 12:00 pm
“Over the past few decades, lake properties have dramatically increased in value, making them harder and harder for the average person to obtain,” writes Cameron Henkel, co-founder of a lake property real estate brokerage. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:52 am
Henkel, 190 U.S. 40, 63, 23 S. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 11:28 pm
Henkel Corporation Gadge USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
Thomas) & Christoph Henkel (Mississippi College School of Law), Sequential Contingent Capital Triggers in Europe and the United States (comments by Mehrsa Baradaran (BYU))(my introductory blog post) [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
Dial Corporation is a subsidiary of Henkel AG & Co KGaA (Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc.), a German consumer products manufacturer. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 11:00 pm
As it turns out, Dial is now owned by Henkel, not P&G. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
By Mark D. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:00 am
For more information about Henkel Corp., including employment opportunities, visit www.henkelna.com. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:45 am
In that post I also mentioned a study by two Munich-based academics, Professor Joachim Henkel and Ph.D. candidate Hans Zischka, one of the key findings of which is this: "For Germany, thus, more than 75% of all active patents are latently invalid, either fully or partially. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
***The Fairfield County Business Journal reports on a new non-compete suit brought by Sun Products and Henkel against a former Chief Technology Officer/Senior Vice-President for Research and Development, Carlos Linares. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:32 am
What is conventional on the market depends on the public’s knowledge of available product designs and market conditions (C-456/01 P ‘Henkel/Waschtabletten’).Distinctiveness in relation to the perception of the relevant publicA trade mark must also enable purchasers of the goods in question, who are reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, to distinguish the product concerned from those of other undertakings without conducting an analytical or… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional representation of the product… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
EUIPO had ruled that the ‘strict test’ applicable to signs that are indissociable from the appearance of goods (as formulated in Henkel and Freixenet), should also apply to pattern marks. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
Instead, the appealed decision only compared the greater difficulties faced in assessing the distinctive character of a three-dimensional mark than of a word or figurative mark.A three-dimensional sign would be distinctive if it serves an origin identifier for the average consumer of the products covered by that mark, without “any detailed examination or comparison and without being required to pay particular attention”, as explained in Henkel (C-218/01) and Forme… [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:08 am
579/17, EU:C:2019:162, paragraph 48 and the case-law cited). [41] [T]he Court has previously held that an action concerning the prohibition on traders using unfair terms, within the meaning of Directive 93/13, in their contracts with consumers, in so far as it seeks to make relationships governed by private law subject to review by the courts, falls within the concept of a ‘civil matter’ (see, to that effect, judgment of 1 October 2002, Henkel, C? [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:03 am
Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc., 496 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2007), the Eleventh Circuit decided a federal trademark infringement lawsuit filed by a manufacturer of a home consumer produce called “Lok-Lift Rug Gripper,” consisting of a two-sided adhesive product that can be applied in strips to the backs of rugs and mats to secure them in place an prevent slippage on various surfaces. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:07 pm
Thomas School of Law) & Christoph Henkel (Mississippi College School of Law), Sequential Contingent Capital Triggers in Europe and the United States Discussant: Mehrsa Baradaran (BYU Law School) Anita K. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
Henkel, El final de la espiral del caos: la regulación de los actos jurídicos unilaterales de los Estados Sergio Peña-Neira, International Law and its Application: Biodiversity and International Obligations Derived from Natural Genetic Resources in Costa Rica Elena F. [read post]
