Search for: "Hernandez, Appeal of" Results 101 - 120 of 1,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 2:30 pm
  (And I'm pleased to see the Court use that exact word at the hearing as well.)The Court of Appeal -- quite understandably -- affirms. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the court concluded that the Hernandez family cannot rely on Bivens to bring their claims against Mesa. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:46 pm
4/1 dismisses an appeal here because the appellant had not become a party to the action by intervening or filing a motion to vacate the judgment (per Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:03 am
After writing about this case the last time it was appealed [click here], I was asked by a lawyer considering whether he should step in as Hernandez's new lawyer what I thought about the matter. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
The Commissioner dismissed Barton’s appeal for a number of technical reasons. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:18 pm by harlanprotass
  In reversing and remanding for re-sentencing yet again, though, the Second Circuit did not rely on Ray and the speedy sentencing principle (perhaps because Ray was decided after briefing on Hernandez's appeal). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in People v Suarez, 6 NY2d 202 [2005] continues to affect murder convictions in the Appellate Divisions. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The court of appeals reversed, reasoning that the insureds had violated their insurance contract by settling with the underinsured motorist without the insurer's consent. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
  The Supreme Court found this challenge was untimely because Hernandez could have raised this allegation on direct appeal but did not. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 In this appeal, as they did in the district court, White Counsel contend that under California law, any conflict of interest in the representation of a class mandates automatic disqualification. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 In this appeal, as they did in the district court, White Counsel contend that under California law, any conflict of interest in the representation of a class mandates automatic disqualification. [read post]