Search for: "Holder v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am by Michael Geist
    Administration From an IP administration perspective, reform of the Copyright Board of Canada is much needed. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In Social Security cases, orders regularly include sensitive personal health information regarding a claimant’s disability. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
The Government has already ruled out extending the points-based visa system, the current immigration policy applied to immigrants from outside the EU, to EU passport holders. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Circuit Approval of the Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Adam S. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Congress, this administration, and our main regulator the FCC view broadband employment/adoption as a principal goal. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
(emphasis added) Geist also complains that the objectives set out in the IP chapter of the TPP do not maintain “a balance between rights holders and users on all IP provisions”. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
  Monitor 13D, F and G positions of top institutional holders, including their investment philosophy, exit horizon, historical cost basis, and any parallel trading activity. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Virginia – used the power of judicial review to raise the professional standards of American public administrators in the fields of education, law enforcement, electoral administration, and family law. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" Adam Klein looked at the issues at play in Spokeo v. [read post]