Search for: "Holmes v. Smith"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:40 am
In Smith-Evans v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
Tom estava sempre arquitetando um plano para capturar o ágil e esperto Jerry – e todos adoravam vê-lo fracassar. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
Tom estava sempre arquitetando um plano para capturar o ágil e esperto Jerry – e todos adoravam vê-lo fracassar. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
I remember sending her P V Baker QC's great work Snell on Equity’ * many years ago - with a bookmark at the page on secret trusts. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Department of Labor issues guidance on requirement that employers provide nursing mothers with breaks and places to express breast milkReed Smith LLPA little-noticed provision of the 2010 health care reform legislation requires employers to provide nursing mothers with "reasonable break time" to express breast milk for one year after a child's birth.Department of Labor interpretation expands the “compensable workday”Holme Roberts & Owen LLPThe… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:46 am
Final passage of H.R. 394 was delayed by the need to resolve a conflict with the “Holmes Group fix” enacted as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) that President Obama signed in September. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 485, 104 S.Ct. 2528, 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (1984)); Holmes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Zaden v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Writing for the Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, “It is not open to question that this statute is constitutional …. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
Packers v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Holm (1932) and Arizona Elected Legislature v. [read post]
